1
00:00:00,070 --> 00:00:01,990
So thank you for the introductions.

2
00:00:01,990 --> 00:00:07,990
We are really happy to be here and to to share
a little bit about our experience in Leko

3
00:00:07,991 --> 00:00:09,109
and Como.

4
00:00:09,110 --> 00:00:15,029
And we entitled this presentation
Restorative Statis as a tool for enhancing

5
00:00:15,030 --> 00:00:17,750
democracy in dark times.

6
00:00:17,751 --> 00:00:23,269
I think Evo did quite a bit of a good
introduction with the democratic table.

7
00:00:23,271 --> 00:00:28,870
So so to say that this is not only a theory,
but it's work on the

8
00:00:28,871 --> 00:00:29,870
ground.

9
00:00:29,940 --> 00:00:35,859
And we will explore a little bit why and
how restorative cities can contribute

10
00:00:35,860 --> 00:00:38,899
to democracy and why dark time.

11
00:00:38,900 --> 00:00:44,740
I think everyone can say dark times
was the title of a European forum

12
00:00:44,740 --> 00:00:49,380
conference, uh, twenty twenty-four,
if I'm not wrong, in Estonia.

13
00:00:49,381 --> 00:00:52,820
It was restorative justice in dark times.

14
00:00:52,820 --> 00:00:58,500
Uh, but I think dark times because democracy
is living currently quite a dark time

15
00:00:58,500 --> 00:00:59,259
everywhere.

16
00:00:59,260 --> 00:01:04,930
In the in the world,
not only um in the in the US or but also in

17
00:01:04,931 --> 00:01:05,939
Europe as well.

18
00:01:08,450 --> 00:01:13,569
Well, uh, first of all,
a little bit about why restorative cities.

19
00:01:13,570 --> 00:01:18,930
I think we heard a lot today in the morning
session about what a restorative city

20
00:01:18,931 --> 00:01:19,969
is.

21
00:01:19,971 --> 00:01:22,450
Um, but why is this important?

22
00:01:22,451 --> 00:01:26,209
Why should we work on restorative cities?

23
00:01:26,210 --> 00:01:31,409
Um, first of all, because cities are
a place where people live together.

24
00:01:31,411 --> 00:01:35,700
And people live together with different
interests, with different needs.

25
00:01:36,349 --> 00:01:39,230
With different identities and visions.

26
00:01:39,231 --> 00:01:42,319
And when these clash, they create conflict.

27
00:01:43,500 --> 00:01:48,859
Um, there are opposing interests,
needs, identities which generate

28
00:01:48,861 --> 00:01:54,540
tensions, fractures, and we heard uh in
the morning sessions about uh lots of

29
00:01:54,541 --> 00:01:58,909
topics creating fractures and
tensions and polarization.

30
00:01:59,659 --> 00:02:04,780
And the third, uh, because we need
somehow to deal with these conflicts.

31
00:02:04,781 --> 00:02:10,620
We can take different routes, different paths,
we will say, to deal with them.

32
00:02:10,621 --> 00:02:15,819
Um, restorative cities choose
the uh restorative justice

33
00:02:15,820 --> 00:02:16,699
way.

34
00:02:16,700 --> 00:02:22,539
So a path that deals with conflicts
through restorative processes, through

35
00:02:22,540 --> 00:02:25,740
restorative practices to restore relations.

36
00:02:25,741 --> 00:02:29,150
And this is quite important also for democracy.

37
00:02:29,710 --> 00:02:34,879
Uh, and not only for democracy,
but for the good living together.

38
00:02:36,659 --> 00:02:40,740
It was not mentioned in the urban agenda
partnership on security in

39
00:02:40,741 --> 00:02:42,419
public spaces on the of the

40
00:02:42,420 --> 00:02:43,939
European Commission.

41
00:02:43,941 --> 00:02:47,539
Restorative cities were not there,
but a lot of concepts that were

42
00:02:47,540 --> 00:02:49,860
mentioned this morning and that we work

43
00:02:49,861 --> 00:02:53,060
on are in that definition.

44
00:02:53,061 --> 00:02:58,900
So the urban agenda, that is a document
drafted by the European Commission guiding

45
00:02:58,901 --> 00:03:04,580
urban policies on security in public
spaces in all the European Union

46
00:03:04,581 --> 00:03:05,580
countries.

47
00:03:05,719 --> 00:03:11,319
Says that strong cohesion is an is
an important aspect in preventing

48
00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:15,319
polarization as well as violence and crime.

49
00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:20,840
It is also an important aspect of good life
and means that people live in trustful

50
00:03:20,841 --> 00:03:21,840
surroundings.

51
00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:28,000
Where mutual understanding and
inclusive participation are high,

52
00:03:28,001 --> 00:03:34,000
where the social and political structures
provide equal opportunities and where

53
00:03:34,001 --> 00:03:36,319
people feel safe and secure.

54
00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:42,159
And it is precisely at the local level
that these factors for cohesion,

55
00:03:42,161 --> 00:03:47,599
democracy, and dialogue must be strengthened,
while the risk factors of

56
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:51,729
division must be kept as low
as possible and even reduced.

57
00:03:52,050 --> 00:03:58,050
And this morning, through uh the work
that uh Bristol did, through the work uh

58
00:03:58,051 --> 00:04:02,580
that North East Dublin did,
Leven, we heard a lot about uh

59
00:04:03,810 --> 00:04:06,849
Understanding, mutual understanding.

60
00:04:06,850 --> 00:04:09,300
We heard a lot about participation.

61
00:04:09,870 --> 00:04:14,879
Participation in uh community life,
in social life, in decision making.

62
00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:20,240
And we heard a lot about the
feelings of feeling safe and

63
00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:24,930
secure, but also about being
able to have a dialogue.

64
00:04:25,500 --> 00:04:26,740
Not to discuss.

65
00:04:27,129 --> 00:04:30,689
But to have a dialogue,
which are different things, as Evo mentioned.

66
00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:36,639
So even though restorative cities were not there,
restorative cities have a lot to say

67
00:04:36,640 --> 00:04:42,079
in building this kind of social
cohesion because they foster

68
00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:47,600
just, trustful, respectful,
responsible and interpersonal

69
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:48,639
relationships.

70
00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:53,120
And these all contribute to this
higher level of social cohesion.

71
00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:58,639
Of course, it's not only about restorative
cities, and we'll see more that restorative

72
00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:00,449
cities are only one piece.

73
00:05:00,660 --> 00:05:01,610
of the puzzle.

74
00:05:01,610 --> 00:05:05,689
Then we have many pieces with
whom we are in dialogue.

75
00:05:05,690 --> 00:05:07,100
In Europe we also have um

76
00:05:07,740 --> 00:05:09,379
Peaceful cities.

77
00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:15,759
Um, we have um ch ch ch ch ch ch
ch ch ch children, cities uh fair

78
00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:20,160
for children, for age people, for LGBTQ.

79
00:05:20,161 --> 00:05:26,079
So we have many movements uh that
can work together towards this goal,

80
00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:29,170
and the restorative city is
one of these movements.

81
00:05:30,350 --> 00:05:34,269
But how this uh interact with democracy?

82
00:05:34,270 --> 00:05:37,069
Well, as I said, I think we we we
we we we we we we we we all assist

83
00:05:37,070 --> 00:05:40,189
to the fact that uh nowadays um

84
00:05:40,190 --> 00:05:44,750
democracy uh is under continuous strain.

85
00:05:44,750 --> 00:05:49,230
We have we see different tendencies,
and um I recommend uh I I'm

86
00:05:49,230 --> 00:05:50,430
not sure it's out there

87
00:05:50,430 --> 00:05:55,949
already, but if you subscribe to the
fundamental rights agencies, they did uh last

88
00:05:55,950 --> 00:05:59,759
year uh big research on human rights trends.

89
00:05:59,920 --> 00:06:05,399
A foresight uh exercise to see how human
rights will evolve in the next thirty years.

90
00:06:06,110 --> 00:06:11,600
And one of the most significant
trends was um democracy backsliding.

91
00:06:12,100 --> 00:06:18,019
Democracy backsliding uh due
to polarization, due to um

92
00:06:18,020 --> 00:06:21,990
normalization of dehumanization narratives.

93
00:06:22,579 --> 00:06:28,500
Exploitation of public resentment
and anger by illiberal movements,

94
00:06:28,500 --> 00:06:34,500
by extremist movements,
declining institutional trust, shrinking civic

95
00:06:34,500 --> 00:06:38,709
space, and persistent participation inequalities.

96
00:06:41,170 --> 00:06:46,689
And to all this, I think in the morning session,
we can reflect on how the

97
00:06:46,690 --> 00:06:52,449
restorative initiatives can move away
these risk factors, or at least

98
00:06:52,450 --> 00:06:58,370
mitigate them, not completely uh make them
disappear, but they mitigate them through

99
00:06:58,370 --> 00:06:59,370
putting

100
00:06:59,389 --> 00:07:05,149
Citizens at the center to recognize
this that people are more

101
00:07:05,150 --> 00:07:10,990
likely to make positive changes when
things are done with them and not

102
00:07:10,990 --> 00:07:14,509
for them, uh, and not to them.

103
00:07:14,510 --> 00:07:19,949
And this is what Wacall and McCall said
already quite a lot of years ago.

104
00:07:19,950 --> 00:07:25,550
And this is also uh a basic principle
that participatory democracy and

105
00:07:25,550 --> 00:07:28,480
participatory processes is uh

106
00:07:29,279 --> 00:07:30,610
is built on.

107
00:07:31,759 --> 00:07:36,639
However, what restorative cities can bring to

108
00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:42,639
this, how can they contribute to
this to mitigating risk factors?

109
00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:46,160
First of all,
treating conflict as an opportunity.

110
00:07:46,161 --> 00:07:51,519
So a lot of people this morning talked
about this, seeing conflict as an

111
00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:57,199
opportunity, as a resource for recognition,
for learning, and collective problem

112
00:07:57,200 --> 00:08:01,009
solving, fostering empathy and
mutual accountability shift.

113
00:08:01,420 --> 00:08:04,620
governance and I will not go because we we
we we we we we we we we we spoke a lot this

114
00:08:04,620 --> 00:08:07,339
morning about participation participation

115
00:08:07,340 --> 00:08:13,259
participation and I would add true
participation because I think this

116
00:08:13,260 --> 00:08:19,180
is where restorative cities and
restorative con practices contribute most

117
00:08:19,180 --> 00:08:21,949
because we have a lot of
participatory processes in Europe

118
00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:24,720
Lots of literature on this.

119
00:08:24,721 --> 00:08:28,370
We have less, much less true participation.

120
00:08:29,420 --> 00:08:35,259
Uh, human rights based democracy,
because restorative cities are grounded in

121
00:08:35,260 --> 00:08:41,259
restorative justice values, as Ivo said,
and these also are grounded in

122
00:08:41,260 --> 00:08:46,940
respect for human dignity,
participation, responsibility, repair,

123
00:08:46,941 --> 00:08:52,620
and uh restorative cities help
to bring these rights and these

124
00:08:52,620 --> 00:08:55,259
values into concrete actions.

125
00:08:55,260 --> 00:08:58,190
And Bruna will uh tell you
more about how can this

126
00:08:58,769 --> 00:09:04,529
Be translated from very big abstract
concepts into um concrete practices.

127
00:09:04,530 --> 00:09:06,769
And most of all, building democratic skills.

128
00:09:06,770 --> 00:09:12,370
I think Ivo spoke a lot about it, and also Emma,
and these are uh skills on which

129
00:09:12,370 --> 00:09:13,970
democracy relies on.

130
00:09:13,971 --> 00:09:18,769
Being able to listen to the other
without judging, first of all.

131
00:09:18,770 --> 00:09:24,210
Uh, being able to have a constructive dialogue,
just be open to the other

132
00:09:24,211 --> 00:09:28,179
opinions, be open to listen to
people you would never listen to.

133
00:09:28,379 --> 00:09:33,659
to or to listen to opinions
that you strongly disagree to.

134
00:09:33,660 --> 00:09:38,139
Inclusive facilitation, negotiation,
collaborative problem solving,

135
00:09:38,140 --> 00:09:39,580
they are all skills on

136
00:09:39,581 --> 00:09:42,539
which our democratic society rely on.

137
00:09:42,540 --> 00:09:46,299
And there are all skills that this morning you
have heard are put in

138
00:09:46,300 --> 00:09:47,820
practice through restorative

139
00:09:47,821 --> 00:09:48,860
practices.

140
00:09:48,860 --> 00:09:54,779
But when we get to us to uh Leko and Como,
uh just a very little

141
00:09:54,780 --> 00:09:57,389
bit int int int int int int int int
int introduction about the context.

142
00:09:57,509 --> 00:10:00,429
So we are here.

143
00:10:01,250 --> 00:10:05,570
Okay, I'm able to show you because
the picture is not very good.

144
00:10:05,571 --> 00:10:10,850
And we are in the Lombardy region,
as Balin said, uh very close to the

145
00:10:10,850 --> 00:10:12,370
Alps.

146
00:10:12,370 --> 00:10:14,769
Two different branches of the same lake.

147
00:10:14,770 --> 00:10:20,450
So we are uh looking to each other from
different parts of the same lake.

148
00:10:20,451 --> 00:10:24,450
Some some very brief
introduction about the context.

149
00:10:24,451 --> 00:10:27,809
Both cities are based on a service based economy.

150
00:10:27,810 --> 00:10:29,299
They all have a very dense

151
00:10:30,110 --> 00:10:35,710
civil society uh we have very
um so to say we had very

152
00:10:35,711 --> 00:10:41,629
different political um movements
some uh lecco had a very long

153
00:10:41,630 --> 00:10:47,149
uh left center left coalition but
como had more movements center left

154
00:10:47,150 --> 00:10:53,070
right civic list so we have very different
political landscape to say not a fixed

155
00:10:53,071 --> 00:10:58,720
one and now uh bruna will say but leco is
again right from center left to center

156
00:10:59,389 --> 00:10:59,870
Right.

157
00:10:59,870 --> 00:11:05,309
So we are the two cities are moving through
different kinds of political ideologies.

158
00:11:05,310 --> 00:11:07,789
I think this is quite important.

159
00:11:07,790 --> 00:11:13,629
Um, in the LECO, there is a very long
standing experience of co design and co

160
00:11:13,630 --> 00:11:19,549
production, so working together, communities,
civic society, citizens and institutions

161
00:11:19,550 --> 00:11:22,909
to design public policies,
especially in the social area.

162
00:11:22,910 --> 00:11:26,029
So this is quite important as well.

163
00:11:26,030 --> 00:11:28,639
Uh in common, this is less.

164
00:11:28,950 --> 00:11:34,149
Um traditional, but in Italy generally
we have a tradition of participatory

165
00:11:34,150 --> 00:11:39,830
processes, more or less true,
but still they are they are there.

166
00:11:39,831 --> 00:11:44,149
Uh, nevertheless, there are established
collaborations between civil society,

167
00:11:44,150 --> 00:11:45,750
judicial institutions, and the

168
00:11:45,750 --> 00:11:48,789
district level body
responsible for social policy.

169
00:11:48,790 --> 00:11:54,710
So we are in a context where institutions
and civic society are used to work

170
00:11:54,711 --> 00:11:55,710
together.

171
00:11:56,129 --> 00:12:01,809
Um, however, we also have a lot of
risk factors because beneath uh

172
00:12:01,810 --> 00:12:07,570
prosperity in both cities we see
precarious employment conditions,

173
00:12:07,571 --> 00:12:12,610
falling income, and widening inequalities,
and this creates a lot of

174
00:12:12,610 --> 00:12:18,419
tensions, polarization, loneliness,
and uh the I would say also

175
00:12:19,980 --> 00:12:23,500
The catch to the the the enemy
between the poor people.

176
00:12:23,500 --> 00:12:26,539
So the other poor people is your enemy.

177
00:12:26,540 --> 00:12:29,500
So lots lots of ideas around this.

178
00:12:29,500 --> 00:12:35,179
So po poor po po po poor citizens
against the poor uh immigrants and so

179
00:12:35,180 --> 00:12:40,269
and po po poor immigrants against the new
arrived immigrants, and we could go on.

180
00:12:41,460 --> 00:12:47,379
Um and this uh basically creates
a fracture in the social pact

181
00:12:47,380 --> 00:12:48,820
that keeps us together.

182
00:12:48,821 --> 00:12:54,740
Como on the other hand is has a lot of migration
because it is at the border with Switzerland

183
00:12:54,740 --> 00:13:00,100
and it is a crossroad for all migrants
that would like to reach northern

184
00:13:00,100 --> 00:13:05,779
Europe, not to stay in Italy,
but use Como as a route for for

185
00:13:05,780 --> 00:13:08,820
going to the northern northern Europe.

186
00:13:08,821 --> 00:13:09,830
And this also creates a lot of

187
00:13:10,370 --> 00:13:16,289
Tensions, social tensions and polarization,
a lot of explotation of public anger

188
00:13:16,290 --> 00:13:18,899
about how to deal with uh migration.

189
00:13:19,889 --> 00:13:25,330
Uh, and in this context,
we wondered why restorative cities.

190
00:13:25,331 --> 00:13:30,450
Well, I think we could take three paths on
how we deal with all these tensions and

191
00:13:30,451 --> 00:13:32,610
polarization, indifference.

192
00:13:32,610 --> 00:13:36,529
Everyone is doing its own business,
and that's all.

193
00:13:36,530 --> 00:13:39,409
Politicians do the rest,
institutions do the rest,

194
00:13:39,410 --> 00:13:41,220
and we only mind ourselves.

195
00:13:42,059 --> 00:13:44,379
Resentful retribution.

196
00:13:44,380 --> 00:13:48,059
This is based on the punitive
concepts we talked about.

197
00:13:48,060 --> 00:13:53,899
So we go for those that uh did the
wrong and we confined them and

198
00:13:53,900 --> 00:13:55,899
we punish them, and that's it.

199
00:13:55,900 --> 00:14:01,659
And these are quite uh quite used,
I would say, but some part of society.

200
00:14:01,660 --> 00:14:03,820
And then we have the restoration.

201
00:14:03,821 --> 00:14:08,139
Restoration well we call the especially Bruna,
where we we we we we we we we

202
00:14:08,140 --> 00:14:09,740
we we we see every crack there

203
00:14:09,740 --> 00:14:11,070
is an opening for a light.

204
00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:16,360
and renewal meaning that conflict is an
opportunity for learning and mutual

205
00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:17,720
understanding.

206
00:14:17,721 --> 00:14:23,639
And I would say that it was mostly
this part that developed in

207
00:14:23,640 --> 00:14:29,559
different ways, but I will leave the
the LECO part to Bruna only to say

208
00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:35,000
that the LECO restorative city
movement started in2012,

209
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:39,769
building on this need for restoration
of a part of the community.

210
00:14:40,250 --> 00:14:46,090
And uh Como started in two thousand
seventeen transferring the model from

211
00:14:46,091 --> 00:14:47,100
Leko.

212
00:14:47,730 --> 00:14:53,570
Uh and it was built around the
the need for another way to

213
00:14:53,571 --> 00:14:59,570
deal with conflicts, because there was
a very um one of the neighborhoods

214
00:14:59,571 --> 00:15:05,490
had a lot of conflicts around migration and
support given to newly arrived migrants, and

215
00:15:05,490 --> 00:15:09,250
throughout the years they tried
different methods to do it with that

216
00:15:09,250 --> 00:15:11,330
kind of conflict and nothing worked.

217
00:15:11,331 --> 00:15:15,649
So what they were asking was,
is is there another way to do it?

218
00:15:15,650 --> 00:15:17,059
Are we doing something wrong?

219
00:15:17,220 --> 00:15:22,700
That is not working because we have generations
change, but we have the same conflicts.

220
00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:30,110
Uh, just a very quick for us,
what means a restorative city.

221
00:15:30,110 --> 00:15:34,590
Well, we are not talking about a label,
uh, we are not talking

222
00:15:34,591 --> 00:15:40,429
about somebody a warning
a quality uh mark that we

223
00:15:40,430 --> 00:15:45,149
are a restorative city, uh,
but we are talking about a process,

224
00:15:45,150 --> 00:15:46,350
about building a

225
00:15:46,350 --> 00:15:50,029
process towards a certain
vision of the community.

226
00:15:50,030 --> 00:15:54,240
So this is a continuous citizen centered journey.

227
00:15:54,649 --> 00:16:00,409
That aims to embed the principles and values
and practices of restorative justice in every

228
00:16:00,410 --> 00:16:05,929
uh social setting where conflict and
harm can arise, with the goal of uh

229
00:16:05,930 --> 00:16:11,049
fostering just, trustful, respectful,
and responsible relationship, as I said before.

230
00:16:11,050 --> 00:16:16,970
And we don't have the presumptions to say that
rest restorative justice is there everywhere,

231
00:16:16,971 --> 00:16:22,169
will ever be there everywhere,
and that conflicts will ever disappear.

232
00:16:22,170 --> 00:16:23,899
We just uh want to continue.

233
00:16:24,059 --> 00:16:30,049
contaminate as much as much as possible as
many people as possible as many organizations

234
00:16:30,050 --> 00:16:35,570
not only private but as Evo said public
and private organizations and as many

235
00:16:35,571 --> 00:16:41,330
policies as possible because this is
a bottom up process but at a certain

236
00:16:41,331 --> 00:16:46,610
level it has to be mainstreamed in
policies to become a more wider

237
00:16:46,610 --> 00:16:48,049
movement.

238
00:16:48,050 --> 00:16:51,730
And with this I will pass the floor to Bruna.

239
00:16:51,730 --> 00:16:53,299
Good morning good afternoon.

240
00:16:53,860 --> 00:16:55,299
More or less.

241
00:16:55,300 --> 00:16:58,659
And please be patient with my English.

242
00:16:58,660 --> 00:17:04,180
I proceed to talk about restorativity city
and about their possible contribution to the

243
00:17:04,181 --> 00:17:05,180
democracy.

244
00:17:05,338 --> 00:17:11,088
I tell you about Lekco and about
our journey of Linominato towards

245
00:17:11,089 --> 00:17:16,098
becoming a restorative city,
starting with the story of Tecla.

246
00:17:16,700 --> 00:17:21,980
Tecla is one of the invisible cities of Italo

247
00:17:21,980 --> 00:17:22,940
Calvino.

248
00:17:22,941 --> 00:17:25,150
It is in Italian literature.

249
00:17:26,210 --> 00:17:32,019
And uh Tekla is a city always under construction.

250
00:17:32,759 --> 00:17:38,750
And when visitors ask the inhabitants
of Tecla why they continue to build,

251
00:17:38,750 --> 00:17:40,720
they answer, so.

252
00:17:41,339 --> 00:17:45,309
That its destruction may not begin.

253
00:17:46,269 --> 00:17:50,230
And when they ask them to
show the plan of the city.

254
00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:53,279
This is a cliff anger.

255
00:17:53,280 --> 00:17:59,119
We cl we we we we we we cut the last
three um lines of the story because

256
00:17:59,120 --> 00:18:02,609
Christina will reveal you at
the end of the presentation.

257
00:18:03,630 --> 00:18:09,390
This image is very meaningful to us
because we also see a restorative

258
00:18:09,391 --> 00:18:13,039
city as a city always under construction.

259
00:18:13,890 --> 00:18:19,490
People are constantly building,
destroying, repairing, and

260
00:18:19,490 --> 00:18:20,490
rebuilding.

261
00:18:20,829 --> 00:18:24,880
It is a useful image image,
perhaps also for democracy.

262
00:18:25,529 --> 00:18:28,369
A restorative city is not a finished model.

263
00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:34,960
And what matters is not only the final result,
but the relationships that are built

264
00:18:34,961 --> 00:18:35,960
along the way.

265
00:18:36,349 --> 00:18:42,190
In this sense, democracy is not only
a system of institutions, it is

266
00:18:42,191 --> 00:18:45,279
also a daily practice of relationships.

267
00:18:46,650 --> 00:18:51,009
This idea has guided our work
in LECCO since twenty twelve.

268
00:18:51,710 --> 00:18:53,549
Creating linnominato.

269
00:18:53,550 --> 00:18:56,960
Linn nominato is restorative
justice intermediary body.

270
00:18:57,519 --> 00:19:03,200
We call the we call denominator an intermediary
body, restorative intermediary body, a

271
00:19:03,201 --> 00:19:09,200
working group through which we are building
LECCO as a restorative city, together with

272
00:19:09,201 --> 00:19:14,880
its citizens and local communities,
developing a permanent

273
00:19:14,881 --> 00:19:19,809
participatory community building process,
bottom up.

274
00:19:20,339 --> 00:19:24,470
Informal and open to voluntary participation.

275
00:19:25,210 --> 00:19:30,480
Its aim is to disseminate restorative
values and practices and to

276
00:19:30,480 --> 00:19:36,480
involve citizens in dealing with conflict,
crime, arm, and

277
00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:37,480
social problems.

278
00:19:38,130 --> 00:19:43,569
So, Linominato is not simply
a service for people, it is a

279
00:19:43,570 --> 00:19:45,539
space with people.

280
00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:50,849
Where they can meet, listen,
discuss, and participate.

281
00:19:51,710 --> 00:19:54,710
Lin nominato is rooted in the community.

282
00:19:55,359 --> 00:20:01,279
Citizens, NGOs, social workers,
and local institutions

283
00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:05,970
work together in a shared
and non hierarchical space.

284
00:20:06,940 --> 00:20:12,940
The idea is not simply to provide
help to citizens, because citizens

285
00:20:12,941 --> 00:20:18,299
can also become active
participants and co producers of

286
00:20:18,300 --> 00:20:19,789
restorative processes.

287
00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:26,240
The process is circular from the city
to the intermediary body, and from the

288
00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:28,369
intermediary body back to the city.

289
00:20:28,859 --> 00:20:33,950
The starting point are usually
people's conflicts, harms.

290
00:20:34,529 --> 00:20:36,099
Pains and needs.

291
00:20:36,799 --> 00:20:42,640
The aim is to work through resentment and,
when possible, restore relations

292
00:20:42,641 --> 00:20:43,640
relationships.

293
00:20:44,670 --> 00:20:49,109
This brings us to the connection between
restorative justice and democracy.

294
00:20:49,819 --> 00:20:52,859
The work of Lin Nominato is
based on the core model.

295
00:20:52,860 --> 00:20:55,819
Do you remember Federica Maggio spoke about it?

296
00:20:55,820 --> 00:20:58,109
The community of restorative relationship.

297
00:20:58,619 --> 00:21:04,190
It promotes a a a a a a a a a a a a culture based
on reciprocity, responsibility, and well being.

298
00:21:04,569 --> 00:21:09,119
It also creates opportunities
for continuous bottom up

299
00:21:09,120 --> 00:21:10,720
participation.

300
00:21:10,721 --> 00:21:15,890
Citizens can work together on local problems,
such as polarization.

301
00:21:16,299 --> 00:21:18,829
Distrust and social disconnection.

302
00:21:19,650 --> 00:21:21,140
Sharing power.

303
00:21:21,410 --> 00:21:25,779
And taking part as co producers
of restorative practices.

304
00:21:26,380 --> 00:21:32,380
that can contribute to democratic
resilience by strengthening human agency,

305
00:21:32,381 --> 00:21:35,309
hope, and the capacity to act together.

306
00:21:36,380 --> 00:21:39,819
I'm going to describe some concrete examples.

307
00:21:39,820 --> 00:21:42,220
Someone speak about the Covid time.

308
00:21:42,221 --> 00:21:43,099
Do you remember?

309
00:21:43,100 --> 00:21:47,069
It seems a century ago, but it was six years ago.

310
00:21:48,690 --> 00:21:54,690
The first example, we called them resto

311
00:21:54,691 --> 00:21:55,940
Covid Circle.

312
00:21:56,450 --> 00:22:00,529
It was developed, a practice, a restorative
practice developed during

313
00:22:00,530 --> 00:22:02,339
the Covid nineteen pandemic.

314
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:05,279
The process had three phases.

315
00:22:05,819 --> 00:22:08,109
First faces in twenty twenty.

316
00:22:08,640 --> 00:22:12,640
The focus of the first phases was on trauma.

317
00:22:12,641 --> 00:22:18,480
Around one hundred citizens in LECO
participated in nine restorative

318
00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:24,400
circles in June twenty nine,
immediately after the first

319
00:22:24,401 --> 00:22:25,400
lockdown.

320
00:22:26,109 --> 00:22:30,400
They included beared people,
people who lost other people.

321
00:22:30,930 --> 00:22:36,930
Isolated people, angry people,
healthcare workers, families,

322
00:22:36,931 --> 00:22:40,660
and citizens in pain, arm and angry.

323
00:22:41,470 --> 00:22:44,079
The aim was to share experience.

324
00:22:44,700 --> 00:22:47,630
And listen respectfully to each other.

325
00:22:48,859 --> 00:22:52,900
In the second phase,
between twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two.

326
00:22:53,210 --> 00:22:56,529
The focus was on conflict and polarisation.

327
00:22:57,220 --> 00:23:00,470
Thirty five participants, half vaccinated.

328
00:23:01,099 --> 00:23:06,910
And half not vaccinated,
met across three restorative circles.

329
00:23:07,390 --> 00:23:11,670
The aim was to open dialogue
across the Green Pass divide.

330
00:23:12,059 --> 00:23:15,140
And begin restoring interrupted relationship.

331
00:23:15,970 --> 00:23:21,700
Finally, in twenty twenty three,
a local association, a big association.

332
00:23:22,160 --> 00:23:27,329
Divided by the Green Pass conflict,
took part in fifteen meetings.

333
00:23:28,349 --> 00:23:32,559
The process moved from rigid
and accusatory positions.

334
00:23:33,180 --> 00:23:36,349
Towards a renewed willingness to communicate.

335
00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:40,079
The restorative practice developed over a year.

336
00:23:40,619 --> 00:23:46,380
With people initially working in
separate circles and gradually moving

337
00:23:46,381 --> 00:23:48,029
toward a common circle.

338
00:23:49,599 --> 00:23:55,119
What is this example why is this example
of Restokovitz circle relevant to

339
00:23:55,120 --> 00:23:56,240
democracy?

340
00:23:56,240 --> 00:24:02,079
Because democracy is also about how people
relate to each other, especially in moments

341
00:24:02,080 --> 00:24:04,690
of fear, tension, and division.

342
00:24:05,309 --> 00:24:09,920
The restorative approach did
not require people to agree.

343
00:24:10,720 --> 00:24:15,759
It created a structured space where
they could listen to different

344
00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:21,680
experiences and understand the
complexity behind different

345
00:24:21,681 --> 00:24:22,680
positions.

346
00:24:23,119 --> 00:24:28,559
For these reasons, we can see this
kind of circle as small democratic

347
00:24:28,560 --> 00:24:29,730
infrastructures.

348
00:24:30,460 --> 00:24:33,390
The facilitators provide the structure.

349
00:24:33,940 --> 00:24:37,589
But that does not solve the
problem for the participant.

350
00:24:38,049 --> 00:24:41,940
The aim is to work with
people and not for people.

351
00:24:43,039 --> 00:24:47,329
The second experience is the
Harmony Erasmus plus project.

352
00:24:47,809 --> 00:24:53,730
Harmony develops and tests restorative
practices in neighborhood and

353
00:24:53,730 --> 00:24:58,019
social housing conflict in Italy,
in France, in Belgium.

354
00:24:58,329 --> 00:25:04,049
The project has four steps analysis,
co design, experimentation, and evaluation.

355
00:25:04,509 --> 00:25:09,140
We study existing practices,
develop a toolkit and train

356
00:25:09,141 --> 00:25:12,500
practitioners, test rest rest rest rest rest
rest rest rest rest restorative approaches

357
00:25:12,500 --> 00:25:15,059
in local context, and collect the lesson

358
00:25:15,060 --> 00:25:16,059
learned.

359
00:25:16,220 --> 00:25:21,819
One of the local experiment is taking place
in Malgrate, that is a little village near

360
00:25:21,820 --> 00:25:26,109
Lecco, in a social housing building
involving eight families.

361
00:25:26,880 --> 00:25:30,319
Here, the important point is co design.

362
00:25:30,320 --> 00:25:35,920
We did not simply bring a ready made
the program into the condominium,

363
00:25:35,921 --> 00:25:38,319
into the house, the social house.

364
00:25:38,320 --> 00:25:40,640
We work in a tailored way.

365
00:25:40,641 --> 00:25:44,369
Every context gets its own bespoke suit.

366
00:25:45,329 --> 00:25:48,420
Members of the nominato, so citizen.

367
00:25:48,910 --> 00:25:54,670
Participated in analyzing the context,
identifying the people to involve, and

368
00:25:54,671 --> 00:25:57,230
designing the restorative process.

369
00:25:57,230 --> 00:26:02,589
The listening phase combined two perspectives,
a professional restorative

370
00:26:02,590 --> 00:26:04,720
perspective of the facilitators.

371
00:26:05,250 --> 00:26:08,500
And citizen member of the nominominato.

372
00:26:09,180 --> 00:26:14,660
And the restorative circle were also
co facilitated by the citizen.

373
00:26:14,869 --> 00:26:16,109
And a professional.

374
00:26:17,009 --> 00:26:22,609
So once again, the process was built
with the community, not simply

375
00:26:22,610 --> 00:26:23,859
delivered to it.

376
00:26:24,410 --> 00:26:29,759
In the final phase,
the co design process moved direct to the

377
00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:30,759
residents.

378
00:26:30,940 --> 00:26:36,609
Through restorative circle,
the inhabitants are developing a chart of good

379
00:26:36,610 --> 00:26:37,700
living together.

380
00:26:38,400 --> 00:26:43,839
The initial result include greater
trust in their capacity to manage the

381
00:26:43,840 --> 00:26:44,839
conflict.

382
00:26:45,019 --> 00:26:48,539
More respectful listening between families.

383
00:26:48,540 --> 00:26:51,150
The conflict was very high, very high.

384
00:26:51,970 --> 00:26:57,809
And greater awareness by the
municipality of the real reason

385
00:26:57,810 --> 00:27:01,809
of the conflict, because the municipality has
strange ideas about the

386
00:27:01,810 --> 00:27:03,650
conflict between the eight

387
00:27:03,651 --> 00:27:04,650
families.

388
00:27:04,769 --> 00:27:06,819
The process is still ongoing.

389
00:27:07,950 --> 00:27:13,950
Finally, I would like to briefly mention
one last very special project that we have

390
00:27:13,951 --> 00:27:16,079
developed over the past year.

391
00:27:16,539 --> 00:27:21,660
We call it Cerchi di Voce or Circle of Voices.

392
00:27:21,661 --> 00:27:27,180
It began in twenty twenty four and
works with the prison as a relational

393
00:27:27,181 --> 00:27:28,180
community.

394
00:27:28,900 --> 00:27:34,099
Around eighty people have taken part
in the initial circle, including

395
00:27:34,100 --> 00:27:39,859
detained people, prison staff,
professionals, volunteers, young

396
00:27:39,860 --> 00:27:45,299
people and students, citizens,
and a lot of institutional civil represent

397
00:27:45,300 --> 00:27:48,390
social civ civil society representatives.

398
00:27:49,019 --> 00:27:50,990
The project asked questions such as

399
00:27:51,839 --> 00:27:56,529
How would we like coexistence and
life together in prison to be?

400
00:27:57,220 --> 00:28:00,789
What does respect mean inside a prison?

401
00:28:01,279 --> 00:28:05,970
How can we turn this reflection into
concrete action and behaviors?

402
00:28:06,660 --> 00:28:11,859
How should we understand the balance
between punishment and rehabilitation?

403
00:28:11,860 --> 00:28:17,539
And what responsibility does the wider
community have for reintegration?

404
00:28:17,540 --> 00:28:20,950
How should society respond to reoffending?

405
00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:26,799
Circle of voices has already
created a space where people who

406
00:28:26,800 --> 00:28:29,970
normally remain separated.

407
00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:36,240
For instance, detained people
and police can speak and listen

408
00:28:36,240 --> 00:28:39,650
to each other in a horizontal position.

409
00:28:40,640 --> 00:28:43,329
Very, very particular frame.

410
00:28:45,089 --> 00:28:51,089
The final event will be held next November during
the international restorative justice week

411
00:28:51,090 --> 00:28:56,769
and will take place simultaneously,
in the same time, in a large civic

412
00:28:56,770 --> 00:29:02,769
auditorium of the city and inside the prison,
in the same time, so we can uh speech each

413
00:29:02,770 --> 00:29:08,609
other, and some of the people
participating in each circle will publicly

414
00:29:08,610 --> 00:29:11,700
share their experience to tell
the project to the city.

415
00:29:12,539 --> 00:29:13,539
Conclusion.

416
00:29:13,809 --> 00:29:16,740
So, what do does experience tell us?

417
00:29:17,380 --> 00:29:22,630
For me, they suggest that the restorative
city is a place under contraction.

418
00:29:23,180 --> 00:29:28,859
Built through concrete practices,
listening, participation, shared

419
00:29:28,860 --> 00:29:31,630
responsibility, and restoration of relationship.

420
00:29:32,210 --> 00:29:35,569
Democracy needs institutions,
but it also needs these

421
00:29:35,570 --> 00:29:37,539
everyday relational practices.

422
00:29:37,920 --> 00:29:43,839
The experiences of Linominator Stokovit Circle,
harmony, and circle of voices

423
00:29:43,840 --> 00:29:47,200
show how this can happen at the local level.

424
00:29:47,201 --> 00:29:52,720
And what matters is not reaching a final
model by the direction we take and the

425
00:29:52,721 --> 00:29:56,480
quality of the relationship
we build along the way.

426
00:29:56,480 --> 00:30:00,400
In this sense,
democracy is also not a destination.

427
00:30:00,401 --> 00:30:05,039
It is a daily practice of just relationship.

428
00:30:05,040 --> 00:30:06,039
Thank you.
